I was waiting for my daily dose of Asia business news this morning on the BBC and right after, there came a story on the elections in India. This news
clip's focus was on interviewing the
Hurriyat conference leader
Mirwaiz Omar Farooq. From previous debates and discussions on Kashmir that I have seen, I remembered the
Hurriyat as an incendiary, unreasonable and mostly illogical group, given to chest beating and nay saying more than anything else. And this short interview with this
Mirwaiz fellow was no different.
His spectacular demands and opinions included:
- Discussion on independence of Kashmir with India Kashmir and Pakistan.
- Debate and decision on independence of Kashmir to be decided by Kashmir and Pakistan (quickly corrected to
Kashmiris)
- Allegation that elections in Kashmir are rigged since according to this chap the "Indian army counts votes". (
Hmmm...maybe he hasn't heard of electronic voting machines the poor fellow.)
Initially, this misguided chap mouthing his party's stance angered and puzzled me. But as I thought about it on my drive into work, I realised that he was also not completely dumb. The
Hurriyat was formed on the basis of seeking independence for Kashmir. However, "independence"really means integration with Pakistan. I don't know now how many
Kashmiris and indeed separatists want to integrate with Pakistan! So now
Mirwaiz and his ilk are drumming for self determination and choose not to test their own standing in India's general election, instead choosing to use the almost comical reason that elections are rigged. The entire free world looks at the Indian election process as free and fair but of course its not good enough for our dear
secessionists, separatists or whatever it is they call themselves today.
This of course comes back to the old problem of how this all started in the first place. After much reading and cross referencing I have arrived at a few simple conclusions. I may not know all the facts but basically:
- Jinnah and his
cronies wanted Kashmir to be part of Pakistan. Why? Because they were a
muslim majority state. Someone should have tapped him on the shoulder then and told him that creating a nation based on such an idiotic ideology would only lead to disaster. I believe Gandhi tried but obviously failed (but he failed because creating Pakistan wasn't at all about a separate homeland for Muslims. It is clear for anyone who cares to look closely now that it was more about a slighted Jinnah wanting to leave his legacy on the world. Why else would a pork eating, whiskey loving atheist demand a separate homeland for Muslims?)
- When the Hindu King of Kashmir wasn't sure about joining forces with the newly formed Islamic state, the Islamic state sent in about 40,000 irregular
pathan goons into Kashmir to foment trouble and to try and annexe Kashmir
- When this tactic was seen, the King went to among other folks Nehru and requested Indian assistance to repel these goons. The condition put forward (and conveyed by Krishna
Menon) was to sign the accession document to India and India would then be able to intervene
- The King signed, Indian troops went in, the goons were thwarted and the Indian army was reclaiming the land occupied by the goons. However, this is when Nehru made one of his legendary mistakes: he went to the UN to seek mediation instead of allowing the army to do its job. The UN came, decided on a plebiscite but troop withdrawals on both sides were not adhered to and hence the
plebiscite was never held
- Status
quo seemed to hold for a while with even elections happening in Kashmir and then in 1965 came
Operation Gibraltar. Of course post 1965, things really go to hell and breakfast. There are massacres, vote
rigging by India, more massacres of
muslims and
hindus, incursions and then in 1989, militancy is born, funded by Pakistan and this continues to go on despite all of Pakistan's platitudes. The
Lashkar e
Toiba has as recently as last month issued a "warning" to all people in Kashmir that suicide bombings would be conducted if
Kashmiris voted in Indian elections.
All this is grist for the mill. The bottom line is this: there is no point revisiting 1947, 1965 or 1778 or whatever date when whatever atrocity or injustice
occurred. This
Mirwaiz wallah and his minions are living about 2 decades back and are unable to realise how the world has changed since, especially post 9/11. While there may have been sympathy for Islamic secessionist movements before, it is fast drying up today. The solution for these guys to be heard is to participate in whatever available democratic processes there are and then raise issues about injustices. However, it is far easier to sit in a house in Kashmir or Srinagar, fuming and fulminating about injustices to the BBC than it is to actually draw up an election manifesto, fight elections and win the trust of people by creating jobs, developing the local economy through sound public policy initiatives. Instead, what our dear ewe lamb
Mirwaiz is insisting upon is "talks with India and Pakistan" to resolve the "Kashmir issue". Yes, yes let us sit on the same table with
Osama's minions and the greasy
Zardari and talk about how all girls' schools in Kashmir can be destroyed. The BBC reporter interviewing this gent was at his sardonic British best, resulting in much squirming on the part of
Mirwaiz. Such fun.
To conclude this post at least, sadly there is no doubt that Pakistan must be involved in reaching some consensus about Kashmir. But that possibility has been put back by years after
Mumbai. Even if
Mumbai didn't happen, I think India and the world have many more things (nukes, Taliban, more insurgents etc) to be concerned about first with regards to Pakistan than the plight of the poor
Kashmiris who have become nothing but victims of a cruel circumstance, almost exclusively not of their own making. So long as the
Mirwaizs of this world are given importance and Kashmir looked at through the lens of being an Islamic society, things will never be resolved. Only if religion is taken out of this equation can Kashmir truly be solved but sadly a state that is founded (by an atheist!) on this very basis cannot well set that aside and more importantly, the guardians of
Kashmiri people who believe
Kashmiris are Muslims first and
Kashmiris second have only doomed themselves and their people to a lifetime of hardship and uncertainty.
I realize also that people may have varying opinions on what I have written, some may be enraged, some may differ in their view. I just want to make it explicit that this is not about Muslims in Kashmir nor is it about Pakistan - baiting. Faults if we want to apportion them will I am sure be apportioned across the board. I am all for finding a solution and I sadly do not see a solution materialising when there are the likes of the Hurriyat who claim to represent aspirations of a people without in any way, earning legitimacy to that claim.
Labels: kashmir, politics, society