That Damn Dam!
Food, as everyone will agree is one of the simple & most dependable pleasures in life. So obviously when a person decides to purposefully deny oneself food (borderline anorexics don't count - looking good is paramount), it leaves me perplexed to say the least.
I for one have never been able to understand the concept of a "hunger strike". For those who came in late, a hunger strike is where a person chooses to fast (threatening to do so unto death) until his/her wishes are granted/changes made. Being a solution oriented or as my DHL friends would say, being a "can do" person, this appears to me to be a passive & massively disconnected approach at addressing an issue. So when Medha Patkar decided to go on a “fast unto death”, more than raising awareness of the issue she is fighting for, what it succeeded in doing for me was causing dark amusement that people would actually deliberately want to kill themselves by starving (for a worthless cause – only case to consider would be if Ms. Patkar was trying to look like Eva Longoria) when there are actually hundreds of thousands of people who actually DO end up dying this way. And here I have not been quick to judge. Ms. Patkar is probably a 50 something woman who has, since she came into my consciousness at least, committed herself to save a dam on the river Narmada. Why she wants to do so and how it will benefit me or the populace at large still remains a mystery. So anyways, Ms. Patkar is definitely not fasting to look good which immediately puts her in the “flummox Abs” category.
However, we live in a democracy. If Ms. Patkar doesn’t want to eat, no issues. But she chooses to not eat in the centre of India’s capital Delhi and also has an entire bunch of lackeys surrounding her & pretending to do the same. (I say this because the cynical bile in me refuses to believe all the lackeys are fasting too, as reported by certain sections of the media). Ms. Patkar, after several days of fasting then decides to accept a glass of salt water from a Cabinet representative. The cynical bile in me laughed wickedly on seeing this in the news – a perfect photo opportunity wasn’t it Ms. Patkar? Complete down to the khadi – clothes - Gandhi - style martyrdom. Remember Gandhi accepting the glass of orange juice from Nehru? (For those who don’t know what I am talking about please either shoot yourselves now or go watch Ben Kingsley win his way to an Oscar playing Gandhi in the movie)
If Ms. Patkar undertook this fast to create awareness about her cause, it has only resulted in annoyance, amusement & cynicism on my part without giving me a shred of information as to her cause. Speeches, interviews, appearances on talk shows, blog campaigns, protest marches even – all make sense and convey the message. A hunger strike only appears as a feeble attempt to ape a brilliant man without understanding the reasons for his actions.
The Narmada Campaign needs more “can do” people.
Not hunger strikes.

2 Comments:
Has Medha ^&$^%& Patkar never experienced a power cut in summer?!? We need more dams, n-reactors and whatever else these people protest against.
Thats beside the point ... what SHE needs are some kick-ass new-age consultants who will tell her hunger-strikes are passe, they take too long. I volunteer, pro-bono, for the sake of all the people who don't have electricity.
Here are my top 3 recommendations:
try the gas chamber and spare us the 8-day agony of seeing her face in the papers
try crossing commisarat road and spare us the 8-day agony of seeing her face in the papers
outsource hunger-strike to somalia
many more ideas but she'll have to pay
if it were not for Medha Patkar, am not even sure that the 400,000 adivasis whose entire lives face displacement would have had a glimmer of hope like they do now and certainly their cause would not have become one of the most important social issues in India today. As for more information about the issue, I find the website abounding in information, facts, news articles and more. I think a simple google search of Medha Patkar will give you all the information you need. Her efforts led to the world bank withdrawing their $450 million funding for a project, that like numerous others across the developing world, would affect the plight of the marginalized and impoverished communities that have taken the brunt of 60 years of dangerous and irresponsible lending.
I was fortunate to have heard her speak in person in Austin. Her motivation and dedication towards this cause is infectious. Her understanding of this issue, not just within the Narmada context, but within the global context is commendable. Medha Patkar represents the voice of the marginalized and helpless rural communities who suffer from the huge inequties that globalization has caused across the developing world. Here are two good articles, amongst others out there, to get anyone interested in this issue up to speed:
http://alternet.org/story/18497/
http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2018/stories/20030912008212700.htm
I do agree that a hunger strike may not be the most sensible protest approach but really one should interpret this as a sign of utter urgency and the need for the Indian government to change their apathetic attitude. My thought is that she has tried every possible strategy in the textbook.
Post a Comment
<< Home