Saturday, April 08, 2006

A "Can Do" response & the common man's perception

Thanks to all the hoopla caused by Medha Patkar over the last few days, it has been hard not to talk about this episode in social circles. Largely, the consensus at least here in Bangalore is that hunger strikes & quasi Gandhian drama will not get one anywhere. However, in response to my post on this topic, Surya talks about the Narmada Dam protests in a comment which I have inserted below:

"if it were not for Medha Patkar, am not even sure that the 400,000 adivasis whose entire lives face displacement would have had a glimmer of hope like they do now and certainly their cause would not have become one of the most important social issues in India today. As for more information about the issue, I find the website abounding in information, facts, news articles and more. I think a simple google search of Medha Patkar will give you all the information you need. Her efforts led to the world bank withdrawing their $450 million funding for a project, that like numerous others across the developing world, would affect the plight of the marginalized and impoverished communities that have taken the brunt of 60 years of dangerous and irresponsible lending.

I was fortunate to have heard her speak in person in Austin. Her motivation and dedication towards this cause is infectious. Her understanding of this issue, not just within the Narmada context, but within the global context is commendable. Medha Patkar represents the voice of the marginalized and helpless rural communities who suffer from the huge inequties that globalization has caused across the developing world. Here are two good articles, amongst others out there, to get anyone interested in this issue up to speed:

http://alternet.org/story/18497/
http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2018/stories/20030912008212700.htm

I do agree that a hunger strike may not be the most sensible protest approach but really one should interpret this as a sign of utter urgency and the need for the Indian government to change their apathetic attitude. My thought is that she has tried every possible strategy in the textbook."


More such thought through responses is what is required to generate awareness & create an urge amongst the educated to support such causes. However, gimmicks such as hunger strikes only serve to dilute the case.

R.K Laxman has once again capitalised on a great topic for satire and this is the cartoon that has appeared in the Times of India today. That taciturn, cynical old man still does have a brilliant sense of humour. The cartoon really does reflect what the common man thinks of it all:

4 Comments:

At Wednesday, April 12, 2006 2:20:00 PM, Blogger Vijay said...

"Medha Patkar represents the voice of the marginalized and helpless rural communities who suffer from the huge inequties that globalization has caused across the developing world."


Ummm... First off, globalization did not cause inequities. Inequities have existed since before the term globalization was even coined, so stop blaming the one possible solution to human suffering as the cause.

Secondly, Medha Patkar does not represent anyone. Nobody has voted for her. She is an individual agitating in such a way as to cause a disturbance and nuisance in the heart of India's capital. If I pulled a stunt like this, they'd throw me in jail.

 
At Wednesday, April 12, 2006 5:39:00 PM, Blogger GyanMaster said...

"I do agree that a hunger strike may not be the most sensible protest approach but really one should interpret this as a sign of utter urgency and the need for the Indian government to change their apathetic attitude. My thought is that she has tried every possible strategy in the textbook."

We are a thriving democracy, many people including myself also believe we are THE most vibrant democracy. Ms Patkar has NOT tried every possible strategy.

I don't understand activists who choose to take an offensive stand against the government instead of trying to be a part of it ... the lack of intellect in politics is hardly surprising.

Even if she doesn't believe in any party ideology she can contest as an independent or even better start her own political party. This is what democracy is all about and if they get their act together and offer viable alternatives, bet it wont be just the adivasis voting for her.

 
At Wednesday, April 12, 2006 6:09:00 PM, Blogger Surya Swamy said...

Globalization is possibly one of the best solutions to poverty; that is a fact. My diatribe is not directed at the overall global order in general, but more against the impact of IMF and World Bank economic policies on the day-to-day lives of the people they are said to benefit. Here is an example of how flawed policies have seriously stunted economic and social growth in Jamaica -http://www.lifeanddebt.org. One of many examples. Again, this is not to say they haven't done good, but in the context of foreign aid, the last few decades have shown time and again that the mechanism of debt can have detrimental impacts on local agriculture and industry if not used wisely.

"I don't understand activists who choose to take an offensive stand against the government instead of trying to be a part of it ... the lack of intellect in politics is hardly surprising."

As far as I know Medha Patkar and others from the National Alliance of People's Movement (NAPM) formed the People's Political Front (PPF) (independent, secular party) in 2004 that contested the Lok Sabha elections with the hope of advancing their cause. I would consider that embracing the ideals of a vibrant democracy.

 
At Monday, April 17, 2006 2:52:00 PM, Blogger GyanMaster said...

Wow! I had no clue ... you're obviously better informed on this but ...

Why didn't she or her party win? Considering 400,000 people who are definitely in support of what she is doing. Thats approx 200,000 voters and if we assume a geographically contiguous area thats a seat at the assembly in any Indian state. What of the other illustrious people in PPF ... did any of them win? What are they upto now?

Is the EC to blame in some way?

Whatever ... thankfully other politicians who lost aren't hunger-striking in Delhi ... the chaos would've been unimaginable.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home